Yahoo Headline: "Climate Change Even worse than predicted" in the article: regarding increased CO2. Not one bit of evidence present specifically related to actual climate change -- just an increase in CO2. This is a logic fallacy called begging the question. The underlying assumption is that CO2 causes climate change. But then to point to an increase in CO2 and say climate change is worse begs the question -- what about actual evidence of climate change. Also, it is circular reasoning -- to say CO2 causes climate change, and then say Climate change is getting worse based solely on the evidence that CO2 emission has increased has not really proved any point. Does CO2 actually have any measurable impact on climate? What about the sun in comparison? Actually it should make them doubt CO2 as a cause of climate change because the increased CO2 is not having any noticeable effect. There is evidence for either cooling or a stabilizing of temperature. But people will read the headline, and simply believe with not one piece of solid climate evidence presented in the article.
In contrast, note the prevalence of information about actual climate in the following article in Newsmax.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment